Marriage
as a Sacrament
By Mr. Krevs
The following is a dialogue
between a non-ordained minister in a Roman Catholic parish and an
engaged couple (semi-practicing, baptized Roman Catholic
Christians). The
dialogue will be an attempt to partially fulfill the third level
of marriage preparation described by John Paul II in his Apostolic
Exhortation, Familiaris Consortio.
This third or immediate level of marriage preparation
involves clearing up
Shortcoming or
difficulties in Christian doctrine and practice
As
they relate to Roman Catholic marriage.
These shortcomings and difficulties stem from a lack of
knowledge and correct understanding of the true nature of
sacrament. In the
dialogue an attempt will be made at greater insight and
understanding of ritual (sign and symbol), grace and the
scriptural and historical foundations as they pertain to the
sacrament of marriage. In
the course of the dialogue, the non-ordained minister will be
simply referred to as "minister" and the engaged couple
as "couple".
Couple:
What difference does it make if
we get married in the Church or at City
Hall?
Minister:
Getting married at city hall
does not activate the sacramental aspect of your marriage. Sacramental actuations involve actions of the Church and the
city hall ritual makes no claims to such actuations. This then is the major difference; one makes a claim to
sacramentality and the other does not.
Couple:
You use the term 'city hall
ritual'. Why do you
call it a ritual? It
is our understanding that rituals are only associated with a
religious contest. Secular
realities do not involve rituals.
Minister:
Evidence can be found that
rituals are not the sole property of the religious realm.
In the
mid-1960's, Erik Erikson
Developed a theory about
the psychological importance of ritual
in the area of human
development. He used
the term ritual in a non-religious contest.
For example, pre-school children who play such game roles
as mommy and daddy, school teacher, sales clerk or sport team
player are really developing social cooperative skills.
Erikson refers to these role playing games as rituals.
Likewise, city hall can be said to possess its own ritual
activity when it comes to marrying couples.
There is an actuating procedure involved, which is common
to all couples who marry there.
Couple:
We now understand how the term
ritual can be applied in both a secular and religious contest. What does the term ritual really mean?
Minister:
In his book Celebrating Sacraments,
Joseph Stoutzenberger defines rituals as
Symbols that include actions,
gestures or movements. [In
short a] ritual is
symbolic action.Symbols are observable realities that represent invisible
experiences.
Applying this definition to Eric Erikson's
use of the term ritual in the psychological development of pre-school children,
we can understand and appreciate why this term was chosen.
The playing of role games (observable reality) enhances the development (invisible experiences) of social cooperative skill, which
become visible as a result of this unseen development.
Couple: What
then is the observable reality and the invisible experience in the city hall
ritual?
Minister: The
consent of the couple as well as the marriage license are part of the observable
reality of the invisible experience of human love.
Couple: This
is also what is involved in the Church ritual.
We will both give our consent and receive a marriage license attesting to
the invisible experience of human love. The
question still remains. Why get
married in the Church?
Minister: Recall
what I said earlier. The ritual
involved at city hall makes no claim to the sacramentality of the marriage
ritual.
Couple: What
do you mean by sacramentality?
Minister: Sacrament
means sign or symbol. Kenan Osborne
in his book Sacramental Theology, A General Introduction
defines a sacrament as a
visible sign, a perceptible symbol of
something invisible and sacred. The
invisible sacred reality to which the sign bears witness is grace.
Notice
that there are two distinguishing features in the above definition: sacred
symbol and grace. St. Augustine
(430 AD) was one of the first Church theologians to reflect and give a
theoretical account of the Church's experience of sacramental life. His definition of sacrament (a visible sign of invisible
grace) in no way contradicts our current understanding of sacrament.
Couple: What
are sacred symbol and grace? How do
both relate to Church marriage?
Minister: A
symbol or sign (observable reality representing something invisible) is sacred
because it bears witness to the transcendent.
Our meeting with God is veiled.
God is not a reality that can be detected by
our five senses. Therefore a symbol
or sign is needed to make present His reality.
In the marriage ceremony the sign or symbol is expressed in the couple's
consent of enduring commitment. It
is a sacred sign or symbol because it is a
reminder of Christ's love, an effective means
by which He acts to make human love capable of being lasting, faithful, fruitful
like His own love of the Church.
Grace in the New Testament means the
generosity by which God gives us new life.
Modern theologians speak of grace in terms of relationship.
In our relationship with God we always receive gifts we do not earn, but
which we gratefully accept. It is
true that God is already related to us prior to receiving the sacrament.
But the sacrament causes an intensification of this relationship.
This intensification of relationship, which begins by being actualized in
the Church's marriage ritual (and continues with the couple's cooperation)
demonstrates itself through time with love that is enduring, faithful and
fruitful. In other words, it shows
forth God's presence and generosity. St.
Augustine, in the fifth century, expressed this in a different way.
The goods (grace) of marriage are sacramentum (lasting and enduring love,
like the love of Christ for His Church), fidelity (faithfulness) and offspring
(fruitful).
Couple: This
sign, symbol, visible and invisible reality seems too esoteric for our
understanding.
Minister: It
probably is, if you cannot see that sign, symbol, visible and invisible reality
or experience is in operation with common everyday experiences.
Both of you are holding each other's hand. Holding hands is not love itself. The reality of love is unseen and can only manifest itself
through such sings as holding hands, hugging and kissing.
This brings us to another very important aspect of signs and symbols.
They are not all arbitrary. Just
as human love can be expressed only through certain concrete signs (punching you
fiancé is not a sign of love), so too sacraments or sacred signs are also not
arbitrary, but are rooted in God's own revelation.
In other words,
The rituals of word and action are by
God's design. He determined that
the reality of His presence will be manifest only in and through the sign or
sacrament on these given occasions.
Couple: The
analogy of love makes the sacramental component of marriage understandable.
Yet, during our studies in university we both came across an article that
stated marriage was declared one of the seven sacraments by the Church in the
twelfth century. Therefore marriage was not a sacrament until this period in
history.
Minister:
It is indeed true that the Church
declared marriage as one of the seven Church sacraments in the twelfth century.
The Lateran Council (1193) declared the wedding ceremony not merely a
civil ceremony, but a sacrament. This
Church teaching was further solidified by the Council of Florence in 1439 and by
the Council of Trent in 1563. Trent
also formally defined a sacrament as 'an outward sign instituted by Christ to
give grace'. The Second Vatican
Council (1965) in its document "Gaudium et Spes" refers to the
sacrament of marriage as a covenant relationship
The intimate partnership of married life and
love has been established by the creator and qualified by His laws.
It is rooted in the conjugal covenant of irrevocable personal consent.
Recall what was said earlier regarding St.
Augustine's theoretical account of the Church's experience of sacramental life.
An analogy might help here. The
ancient Greeks began the study of the nature of light.
Sir Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein and others continued to further
elaborate on this reality called light, but even today we are unsure of its
precise nature. As Thomas Dubay
points out in his book Faith and Certitude
The inability of scientists to compose the
wave and quanta characteristics of light is no argument against the existence of
light or its well-established characteristics.
Similarly,
the fact that the Church formally declared marriage as a sacrament in the
twelfth century is not proof that the reality of marriage was not in some way
sacramental prior to this formal pronouncement. Evidence for marriage as sacrament can be found rooted in
sacred scripture, long before the church had developed both the definition of
sacrament and established marriage as one of the seven sacred signs.
For example, in the Old Testament evidence favoring the sacramental
nature of marriage can be found in Gen1:27-28 and Gen2:20-24.
In Mal2:10-16 marriage is seen as a covenant, one which was compared to
the covenant established by God with Israel.
In the New Testament St. Paul, in his Epistle to the Ephesians
(Eph5:21-32) uses the term mystery, which in Greek is mysterion
and refers to the hidden plan of God. Therefore
what St, Paul says of marriage is part of this divine plan.
The
union of Christ and His Church is so intimate as to find no more apt comparison
than the relation of husband to wife.
In
summary then, long before the Church defined a sacrament and formally confirmed
and intellectually articulated marriage as a sacred sign or symbol, it had
already been living the sacrament.
Couple: For
whom is marriage a sign or symbol of the unity of Christ and His Church?
Minister: Marriage
is a sign or symbol of the unity of Christ and His Church only for the Christian
community.
Couple: What
you are saying is that the Christian community, by their act of believing
establishes the significance of the sign or symbol.
Minister: Our
believing it to be this way does not establish that it
is this way. The objective
reality obtained by revelation (through scripture, tradition and current
magisterial teaching) precedes our subjective affirmation.
When we say that marriage is a sign or symbol of Jesus' love for the
Church and is only meant for Christians, this simply means that only Christians
themselves can perceive it, since they alone are aware or sensitized to this
reality. This in no way implies
that others will never be able to 'see' what we as Christians 'see'.
Couple: An
analogy would be helpful here.
Minister: For
whom is chemistry an understandable subject?
Couple: Chemistry
is understandable only to the 'eye' which is aware of the chemical nature of
matter.
Minister: What
you have stated is true. It is
worth pointing out that the chemist as a subject does not 'make' the reality of
matter he is studying by his believing alone.
There is a reality that exists independent of the mind.
Couple: Could
you encapsulate what is therefore means to be married in the Church?
Minister:
Marriage is a sacrament.
As a sacrament it is a faith celebration [accepting revelation as true] of
specific words, actions and objects [signs, symbols - seen realities] chosen by
Christ and the Church [the history of our faith has resulted in our recognizing
marriage as a special way that God can come into our lives], which brings us a
share in God's life [grace - the unseen reality].
Couple: If
marriage brings us a share in God's life, why is it that many Christian Catholic
marriages end in divorce and separation? God
brings unity not division.
Minister: As
already stated earlier, God's free gift of himself to the married couple is both
revealed and deepened in the sacrament of marriage.
The sacrament works through the actions correctly executed with the
intention of the Church. The
Council of Trent taught that the sacrament achieves its effect not because of
the faith of the recipient and or the worthiness of the minister, but because of
the power of Christ who acts within and through it.
The problem is not God. The
problem lies with us. Our maturity
or immaturity and our dispositions can influence the full effect of grace in our
life. Humans can set up obstacles
such as fear, pride, greed and love of self.
In short sin is the obstacle, which can minimize the full effect
of grace.
Your intelligent and honest questions,
coupled with your desire to know truth are excellent means of preparation in
achieving the full effect that grace will have on your marriage, when you both
confer this sacrament on each other.
Bibliography
Abbott,
Walter M., ed. The
Documents Of Vatican II.
U.S.A. : Western
Publishing Company Inc., 1966.
Bausch,
William J. A New Look At The Sacraments.
Connecticut: Twenty - Third Publications, 1991.
Dubay,
Thomas. Faith And
Certitude. San Francisco:
Ignatius Press, 1985.
Mackin,
Theodore. Marriage in the Catholic Church.
What is Marriage?
Ramsey, N.J.: Paulist Press, 1982.
Martos,
Joseph. The Catholic Sacraments.
Message of the Sacraments 1.
Wilmington, Delaware: Michael
Glazier, Inc., 1983.
Osborne,
Kenan B. Sacramental Theology. A General Introduction.
New York: Paulist
Press, 1988.
Pope
John Paul II. Familiaris Consortio. Boston, MA: Daughters
of St. Paul, 1981.
Prieur,
Michael R. Married In The Lord. Bethlehem
Pennsylvania: Catechetical Communications, 1978.
Schillebeeckx,
Edward. Marriage:
Human Reality and Saving Mystery.
London England: Sheed
and Ward, 1965.
Stoutzenberger,
Joseph. Celebrating
Sacraments. Minnesota:
Saint Mary's Press, 1984.
The
New American Bible.
Iowa: World Bible
Publishers, Inc., 1991.
Wuerl
Donald W., et al. ed. The
Teaching of Christ.
A Catholic Catechism For Adults. 3rd
ed. Indiana: Our
Sunday Visitor Inc., 1991.
Endnotes
Pope John Paul II, Familiaris Consortio (Boston, MA: Daughters
of St. Paul, 1981), p.98.
Joseph Martos, The Catholic Sacraments.
Message of the Sacraments 1 (Wilmington,
Delaware: Michael Glazier, Inc.,
1983), p.37.
Joseph Stoutzenberger, Celebrating Sacraments (Minnesota: Saint
Mary's Press, 1984), p.34.
Kenan Osborne, Sacramental Theology.
A General Introduction (New York: Paulist Press,
1988), p.7
Donald W. Wuerl (ed.), The Teaching Of Christ A
Catholic Catechism For Adults, 3rd ed.
(Indiana: Our Sunday Visitor Inc., 1991), p.358.
Walter Abbot (ed.), The Documents Of Vatican II
(U.S.A.: Western Publishing Company Inc., 1966), p.250
Thomas Dubay, Faith And Certitude (San Francisco:
Ignatius Press, 1985), p.243
Michael Prieur, Married In The Lord (Bethlehem
Pennsylvania: Catechetical Communications, 1978), p.33
|
|
|